Methodology

1. Purpose of Our Broker Rankings

Broker rankings published on CT Advisory24 are designed to support users in navigating a complex and constantly evolving financial services landscape. Rankings aim to highlight brokers that meet defined standards of reliability, transparency, usability, and overall service quality.

Rankings are comparative analytical tools, not endorsements or personalized recommendations. They are intended to assist research and decision-making, not to replace independent due diligence.

2. Broker Universe & Initial Selection

CT Advisory24 evaluates a broad universe of online brokers operating across multiple regions and markets. Brokers included in our analysis typically provide access to financial instruments such as stocks, ETFs, Forex, CFDs, cryptocurrencies, or other tradable assets.

The initial selection process considers factors such as:

• Availability of verifiable, publicly accessible information
• Operational history and market presence
• Geographic reach and client accessibility
• Regulatory status in recognized jurisdictions

Not all brokers available on the market are included in rankings. Inclusion depends on data availability, relevance to users, and minimum transparency standards.

3. Core Evaluation Framework

Each broker is evaluated using a structured multi-factor framework. The framework is designed to capture both quantitative and qualitative aspects of a broker’s offering, while maintaining consistency across markets and ranking types.

The evaluation model is based on five core parameters. Each parameter is assessed independently and rated on a 0–5 star scale.

Important: Brokers with weak Regulation & Security cannot rank at the top, regardless of strong performance in other areas.

3.1 Regulation & Security

This parameter assesses the regulatory environment in which a broker operates and the mechanisms in place to protect client funds and data. Licensing status, investor protection schemes, disclosure practices, and operational transparency are reviewed.

3.2 Costs & Pricing

Pricing structures are evaluated based on trading fees, spreads, commissions, and non-trading costs. Particular attention is given to pricing transparency and consistency with publicly disclosed fee schedules.

3.3 Platforms & Technology

This parameter focuses on the quality, stability, and functionality of trading platforms across web, desktop, and mobile environments. Both proprietary platforms and widely adopted third-party solutions are considered.

3.4 Markets & Instruments

The range and diversity of available markets and instruments are reviewed, including access to local and international assets. Evaluation considers whether the offering is aligned with the broker’s stated target audience.

3.5 User Experience & Support

User experience factors include account onboarding, verification processes, customer support availability, language support, and access to educational or informational resources. Practical usability and service accessibility are key considerations.

4. Star-Scale Definitions (0–5)

5. Short Methodology Statement (Reusable)

6. Data Sources & Validation

CT Advisory24 follows a data-driven approach based on verifiable and reproducible information. Data sources may include regulatory registers, broker documentation, pricing schedules, platform specifications, publicly available disclosures, and observable service features.

Where applicable, third-party information may be consulted for contextual reference. Promotional claims are not accepted as evaluation inputs unless supported by verifiable data.

7. Scoring Model & Comparative Analysis

Each of the five evaluation parameters contributes to a structured scoring process. Parameter scores are assigned independently using the same evaluation logic across all brokers.

The final broker score displayed in rankings and broker cards represents a normalized comparative value derived from the aggregated parameter ratings. Rankings reflect a balanced view of multiple dimensions rather than reliance on a single isolated metric.

8. Editorial Independence & Commercial Relationships

CT Advisory24 operates with editorial independence. While commercial or affiliate relationships may exist, no broker can pay to influence evaluation results or ranking positions.

Any commercial relationships are disclosed separately in accordance with our Financial Disclosure.

9. Updates & Methodology Evolution

Broker evaluations and rankings are reviewed periodically to reflect changes in regulatory status, pricing structures, platform features, or service offerings. The methodology itself may evolve to incorporate improved data sources or updated evaluation standards.

Rankings are updated when material changes occur.

10. Limitations & User Responsibility

While CT Advisory24 strives to maintain accurate and up-to-date information, rankings should be considered informational tools rather than definitive judgments.

Users are encouraged to independently verify information and assess whether a broker’s services align with their individual needs, experience level, and risk tolerance.

11. Transparency & Contact

Transparency is a core principle of CT Advisory24. Questions regarding our evaluation framework or broker rankings can be directed to:

Email:
info@ctadvisory24.com